Skip navigation
3102 Views 7 Replies Latest reply: Oct 22, 2007 7:57 PM by Daniel Henninger RSS
Bronze 13 posts since
Jul 19, 2007
Currently Being Moderated

Oct 14, 2007 11:20 AM

MSN id had pending "add me" requests - why didn't gateway auto-approve them?

 

I have been getting error reports that my bot is not allowing new users.  So I signed on manually to the bot's MSN id and saw it had 21 pending buddy add requests.

 

 

Shouldn't the im gateway have auto-approved these?

 

 

 

 

 

  • Daniel Henninger KeyContributor 2,972 posts since
    Aug 10, 2005

    In theory the end user ought to be approving them.  If I just auto-approved them then any old spammer or whatever could come through and add away and get full access to when you are logged in and such.  You should be able to code your bot to handle XMPP approval requests though.  If the approval requests aren't making it through to your XMPP based bot, then that is definitely an issue.  =)

          • Daniel Henninger KeyContributor 2,972 posts since
            Aug 10, 2005

            Hrm, ignore my other thread post.    Anyway, the "to" vs "both" means nothing in terms of the transports.  Well, not in the way you are describing anyway.  msn.yourserver.org is the conduit through which all presence changes occur.  Direct-to-contacts presence notifications do not get through.  (for the most part, there's no reason to do this with the legacy contacts, they go entirely by a single setting, which is handled by msn.yourserver.org)  I am setting to "to" because it cuts down on needless traffic to the gateway (by a very very large degree).

             

            Lets see...  MSN actually has a similar presence structure to XMPP in that there are "forward" and "reverse" lists that correspond to "to" and "from" in XMPP.  However MSN also has block and allow lists.  The person has to be authorized and placed on the "allow" list for the MSN contact to be able to see you online.  This step is performed when you add the contact back but now that I think about it, I don't believe that it's done on a simple authorization.  (in other words, you -have- to add them back for them to see you)  Does this sound like it might be what you are running into?

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)